Home inspections have
been conducted since the first time a prehistoric family sent someone
into a cave to check it
out for them before they moved in. If that hapless first inspector
failed to
notice evidence that a saber-tooth tiger may already be calling
the cave "home," the family might rightfully want to extract some
form of retribution from the inspector for losses they may have suffered
at the paws and jaws of the tiger. Almost nothing has changed since
those days, except that homes are now far more complicated and a whole
profession has sprung up to help folks find out about the conditions
of the property (for a fee) before they move in and other professionals
are now available to help them extract retribution (for a fee) if the
inspector misses any tigers. That first inspector's defense might have
been: "No tiger observed in the cave at the time of the inspection" and
would obviously have fallen on deaf ears, if indeed there were
any ears left for it to fall on, at all.
After today's inspections
and reports disclose observations of evidence of water penetration,
a listing agent's almost immediate
question is often: "But, was the roof leaking at the time of the
inspection?" Whether the issue is the damage a tiger in your
house might do to you, or the house, or the damage rain through
your roof
might cause, this issue is at the core of the controversy between
some real estate agents and some home inspectors about home buyers'
rights
to know about the condition of the property they want to buy.
How do a potential property-owner's
personal rights compare to a current property owner's property
rights? And, exactly
who says so? Who is willing to interfere in any way with the rights
of a potential property-purchaser trying to learn EVERYTHING they
can
about a property? Who determines how many days a buyer may have
for investigations and inspections? Who decides who they can use
to do their
investigations and inspections? And, who is willing to be legally-liable
for the difference between what a qualified and competent professional
home inspector can find out, given sufficient time to perform a thorough
inspection and write a unique and comprehensive report and what might
be discovered and reported by an over-optimistic, quickie low-bidder
inspector with a "short-form" checklist report? Who will
step forward to make good for the damage the tiger does?
Really professional selling
agents realize that ecstatically-satisfied buyers can be created
by making sure that they know in advance about
the "warts" and even "tigers" that may lurk in their
new home and offering to help deal with them. These agents know that
their satisfied buyers tell their friends and relatives about their
experience, creating almost "sure-thing" personal referrals.
Savvy listing and selling agents know that they are held to a much higher
"standard of care" than the sellers and cannot rely on an
"Unknown" response on the Seller Property Disclosure Statement.
They actually look forward to a really comprehensive professional inspection
to lift the unnecessary burden of liability for property condition from
their shoulders and put it where it belongs: On the shoulders of the
inspector, where it is welcome and "just part of the job."
In our common real estate community, agents, lenders,
appraisers, title companies and inspectors can work together in harmony
to take a transaction from listing to closing, or they can work at odds
with each other, making every step unnecessarily difficult. The choice
is largely up to the agents. At the center of almost every transaction,
agents often determine who will be the lenders, the appraisers, the
title companies and the inspectors. Denying it as they do it, they direct
transactions like the conductors of symphony orchestras, but not always
with acceptable results. According to the ADRE, the result is often
a claim against the agent for property condition. In fact, the most
prevalent claim against ADRE licensees is for property condition. With
the availability of so many qualified and competent professional home
inspectors, this is quite unnecessary.
Agents can "dump liability" and
still know what to expect in an inspection by using the 1-800-723-2790
number
provided by the Arizona Chapter of the American Society of Home Inspectors,
Inc.
(ASHI ) to help their buyers find a professional inspector. A call
to this number will get an almost instant FAX reply with a list of
full
Members of the AZ-ASHI chapter who work in the area of the prospective
sale property. Inspectors on the list have met the rigorous requirements
of ASHI Membership and are qualified to perform inspections in accordance
with ASHI's Standards of Practice. A request made at the 1-800 number
will get a free copy of the Standards of Practice and Code of Ethics
sent anywhere by mail. A personal supply of these useful booklets
can
be obtained at very small cost, so that every prospective home
buyer can know what to expect from an inspection and can make their
own choice
from a list of ASHI-qualified inspectors. Agents with a complaint
about the performance of any inspector on the list can call the same
number
and register it.